TANGGUNG GUGAT HENDRI DAN PEGAWAI BNI TASIKMALAYA TERHADAP SISKA GOEI ATAS KERUGIAN AKIBAT PEMBLOKIRAN BILYET GIRO

  • Fabiola Ceasaria Tiffany Universitas Airlangga

Abstract

Hendri deeds that determine the existence of blocking bilyet giro but still use the one sheet of bilyet giro by transfer it to Siska Goei as payment and he does not informed about the blocking bilyet giro to Siska Goei including wanprestasi action because failure to discharge duty in an agreement so Hendri shall provide compensation in the form of reimbursement of costs, damages and interest based on Article 1243 jo. Article 1246 of the Code Civil Law. BNI Tasikmalaya’s employee acknowledge inaccuracies in selecting the reason for blocking bilyet giro because limited time and has become a habit of picking reason missing on the Certificate of Rejection (SKP) Bilyet Giro. BNI Tasikmalaya’s employee who do omission / lack of caution can be liable based on Article 1367 Code Civil Law, get administrative sanction which is an obligation to pay based on Article 27 act (1) Regulation of Bank Indonesia number 8/29/PBI/2006 for break the rule of Article 13 act (1) Regulation of Bank Indonesia number 8/29/PBI/2006, that does not administer Bilyet Giro with complete and right rejection. Keywords: Liability, Administrative Sanction, Bilyet Giro.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Merupakan jurnal elektronik yang berisikan artikel ilmiah, essay hasil hasil penelitian dan pengabdian masyarakat, dalam bidang hukum bisnis, hukum ekonomi syariah, hukum perdata dan kebijakan publik, untuk sebagai kepedulian terhadap persoalan hukum didunia bisnis khususnya kalangan usaha kecil dan menengah
Published
2018-04-27