Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS

KEDUDUKAN TANAH ADAT DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM DI KABUPATEN MANOKWARI PAPUA BARAT

2025-01-19T19:18:01+07:00

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganaliis mekanisme ganti rugi atas tanah adat dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum, lalu untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis upaya hukum masyarakat adat atas adanya ketidaksepakatan ganti rugi dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum di Kabupaten Manokwari Papua Barat. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan hal tersebut hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa, pengaturan penyelenggaraan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum sebagai landasan hukum bagi penyelenggaraan pengadaan tanah supaya tidak terjadi kesewenang-wenangan dari pemerintah atau panitia pelaksana pengadaan tanah, misalnya dengan tidak memberikan atau hanya memberikan ganti kerugian yang tidak sesuai dengan kesepakatan antara kedua belah pihak. Pemberian ganti rugi dalam bentuk uang sejauh ini dianggap lebih mudah dalam penghitungan dan lebih efisien, karena masyarakat dapat mempergunakan sebagai modal utuk kehidupan yang lebih baik. Pasal 78 ayat (1) sampai dengan ayat (7) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan dan Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum diharapkan dapat menjadi payung hukum.

Kata Kunci: Kedudukan Tanah Adat, Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum, Pengadaan Tanah di Kabupaten Manokwari Papua Barat

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NEGOTIATING BANK DAN EKSPORTIR ATAS DISKONTO WESEL EKSPOR DENGAN LETTER OF CREDIT

2025-01-19T19:18:04+07:00

This research discusses the form of legal protection for negotiating banks as intermediary banks and exporters for discounts on export bills using the Letter of Credit payment method. The problem that arises in this paper is that international trade has the potential for payment uncertainty if the importer and/or issuing bank does not provide collateral worth the L/C so that the beneficiary cannot cash the L/C as well as the changing money order discount policy from the central bank. The research method used in this research is a normative juridical research method. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the legal strength of the implementation of Government Regulation Number 29 of 2017 concerning Methods of Payment for Goods and Methods of Delivery of Goods in Export and Import Activities regarding Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCPDC) 600 for Negotiating Banks and Exporters still has many weaknesses and The international community tends to use UCPDC 600 because it is a source of international law originating from custom and binding legal force for issuing banks and importers. If default is limited to the sales contract before the importer requests an L/C to be issued to the issuing bank if this does not include a guarantee worth L /C. The obstacle is that not all import business actors are willing to provide guarantees worth the L/C but also the urgency of needing goods is very high.

Key words : eksporter, legal protection, letter of credit

Batasan Hakim dalam Menetapkan Justice Collaborator dalam Perkara Pidana Korupsi

2025-01-19T19:18:06+07:00

Di Indonesia penyelesaian kasus korupsi sangat terbantu sejak adanya justice
collaborator. Hukum nasional yang menjadi pedoman bagi pengadilan adalah SEMA No.
4 Tahun 2011. Namun keberadaan SEMA tersebut tidak mengikat sebagaimana UndangUndang. Dalam hal ini terdapat pengaturan yang berbeda untuk setiap aparat penegak
hukum dalam menentukan apakah seseorang dapat diberikan status sebagai justice
collaborator. Dengan metode dan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan
pendekatan konseptual, penulis membahas standar hakim dalam menetapkan justice
collaborator dalam perkara pidana korupsi. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa
justice collaborator diatur dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2006, UU No. 5 Tahun 2009, UU No.
31 Tahun 2014, dan SEMA No. 4 Tahun 2011. Oleh karena SEMA sifatnya mengikat ke
dalam lingkungan peradilan, maka dikeluarkanlah Peraturan Bersama untuk
menyelaraskan aparat penegak hukum dalam menangani perkara. Berdasarkan analisis
putusan dalam pembahasan ini dapat diketahui bahwa tolak ukur hakim dalam menetapkan
status justice collaborator hanya menggunakan SEMA No. 4 Tahun 2014.
Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Justice Collaborator; Tindak Pidana Korupsi

DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA NO.124/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Sby TENTANG GUGATAN HARTA BERSAMA

2025-01-19T19:18:09+07:00

In this research, writer discuss problem about justice consideration in disconnect decision cancel religion court level one Mojokerto to problem number.124/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Sby attempt lawsuit treasure together.In constitution number 50 year 2009 to number 3 year 2006 to number 7 year 1989 attempt religion court that mentioned treasure together is scope authority religion court, chapter however 136 HIR ( Herzien Inlandsch Reglement) mentioned is exeption wich delivered appellee obout with authority judge.This research a purpose to analise identification decision problem number 124/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Sby attempt decision cansel religion court level one Mojokerto to problem lawsuit treasure together. With thereby van to see which what base become justice consideration in this cancel problem.This research is normative legal research with use constitution approach and conceptual approach with analysis engineering wich used research is kualification description engineering.results this research is decision problem number 124/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Sby.

Keywords: justice consideration, religion court, treasure

Analisis Kedudukan Surat Keterangan Hak Milik dalam Sengketa Agraria (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Manado Nomor : 25/G/2023/PTUN. MDO)

2025-01-19T19:18:11+07:00

Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 Article 97 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units and Land Registration states that "Certificate of Ownership Rights, Compensation Certificate, Village Certificate and others of the same type which are intended as Certificate of Ownership Rights for land can only be used as a guide for land registration. However, on the other hand, if the certificate of ownership rights can only be used as a guide for land registration, various new problems will arise, therefore the author is interested in discussing the position of the certificate of ownership rights in the Manado State Administrative Court Decision Number: 25/G/2023/PTUN. MDO with the aim of knowing the Position of the Certificate of Ownership Rights as Proof of Ownership of Land Rights and Knowing and Analyzing the Position of the Certificate of Ownership Rights in the Manado State Administrative Court Decision Number: 25/G/2023/PTUN. MDO will then be examined by the author using a normative research method with a legal analysis approach or also called legal analysis, namely research conducted by analyzing applicable legal rules (Legal Research) so as to produce conclusions so as to produce conclusions In terms of the position of the evidence of the Dorneka Tawatua Land Ownership Certificate, it is valid and recognized as evidence, but proof of ownership of land rights based on the Land Ownership Certificate alone is not enough, but must also be proven by physical data and other legal data. However, Decision Number: 25 / G / 2023 / PTUN. MDO The Plaintiffs' Lawsuit was not accepted because the Dorneka Tawatua Land borders the land. The disputed object certificate is not included in the disputed object certificate so that there is no clauseal relationship with the disputed object certificate. Keywords: Land Ownership Certificate, Agrarian Dispute, Jurisprudence

KEDUDUKAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH KOTA SURABAYA UNTUK TIDAK MEMBERIKAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK KEPADA SUAMI YANG DIPUTUS BERCERAI OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA SEBELUM KEWAJIBAN NAFKAH DIPENUHI

2025-01-19T19:18:19+07:00

Licensing is one form of administrative public service provided by the government to the community. To ensure the fulfillment of rights and legal certainty for the community in obtaining licensing services, the government, especially the regional government, has prepared service standards which are stated in the form of a Regional Head Decree or a Regional Apparatus Head Decree. However, the right to obtain licensing services can be limited if there is a court decision that has permanent legal force ordering the regional government not to provide licensing services to a person or legal entity. In order to protect the rights of women and children after divorce, the Surabaya City Government and the Surabaya City Religious Court have made an agreement containing a policy not to provide public services including licensing services to husbands who have not fulfilled their obligation to provide support based on a court decision issued by the Surabaya City Religious Court. The legal issue of concern is the validity of the contents of the Surabaya City Religious Court Decision considering that divorce cases are cases of the parties and the regional government is not a party to the case. Based on general legal principles, judges in deciding cases are prohibited from taking legal action without legal authority. In this case, the divorce dispute filed by the parties only discusses the resolution of the dispute that occurs between the parties. With the existence of the Surabaya City Religious Court Decision which has permanent legal force, the Surabaya City Government is bound not to provide licensing services.

Keywords: Licensing Services; Regional Government Policy; Protection of Women and Children