Refinement Method of Retaining Wall (L-Shape Concrete) and CCSP Design in Kalimas Quayside Kademeter 1200-1400 Project

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published Jul 14, 2020
DOI https://doi.org/10.29138/ijti.v3i1.1055

Main Article Content

Margantionius Margantionius
Narotama University Surabaya
Ronny Durrotun Nasihien
Narotama University Surabaya

Abstract

As one of the state-owned enterprises (BUMN), PT Pelabuhan Indonesia III (Persero) Regional Jawa Timur has demanded to obtain the considerable revenues using the limited maintenance funds for port facilities. One of the roles of Engineering Division includes the availability of port facilities that support operation division, so it is necessary to check and maintain the facilities. In consequence, the estimated cost and time of project carried out effectively to mitigate the risk level in the future in order to achieve the main objectives. One of the biggest revenues in the port sector is on the quayside facility services, therefore, maintenance of these facilities needs to be prioritized. The final project provides an analysis of cost and time calculations using the method of repairing the retaining wall (L-Shape Concrete) and the CCSP (Coruggated Concrete Sheet Pile) method for repairing damage to Kalimas Kademeter Quayside 1200-1400 with damage length of 176 meters and width of 9 meters. Based on the observation of cost and time analysis, the estimated cost of using the L-Shape Concrete repair method is much cheaper than using the CCSP (Coruggated Concrete Sheet Pile) method, but the actual project period is much longer. Finally, the selection of repair methods can adjust to the necessity of cost and time aspects, as well as the methods of project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
MargantioniusM., & NasihienR. (2020). Refinement Method of Retaining Wall (L-Shape Concrete) and CCSP Design in Kalimas Quayside Kademeter 1200-1400 Project. JTI nternational ournal of ransportation and nfrastructure ISSN 2597-4769 ISSN 2597-4734, 3(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijti.v3i1.1055
Issue
Vol 3 No 1 (2019): September 2019
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Alya Risdiyanti, Siswoyo. (2018). Cost and Time Comparison Analysis Between Conventional and Preprinted Methods (Case Study: Underpass Satellite Mayjend Sungkono Surabaya Round about).
Brown, William D. (1994). Design Of Sheet Pile Walls, Design Of Sheet Pile Walls, pdf.
Djoni Irianto, Dwi Ratih Wewesa. (2013). Designing Corrugated Concrete Sheet Pile (CCSP) on Wonokromo River Improvement Project Surabaya Sub-Project Package-3. Surabaya.
Didiet Adhytiya. (2014). Alternative Planning for Underwater Retaining Wall Mayjen Sungkono Surabaya.
Eka Setyowati. (2012). Plaster Construction Planning Instead of Retaining Walls (Case Study: Donggala Ring Road).
Hatwan Fardilla. (2018). Retaining Wall Planning as an Alternative to Preventing Landslides in Bridge Construction.
Hardiyatmo, H.C (a). (2002). Soil Mechanics I. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Hardiyatmo, H.C (b). (2003). Soil Mechanics II. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Hardiyatmo, H.C (c). (2006). Management of Landslides and Erosion. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Isti Radhista Hertiany. (2014). Construction Design Sheet Pile Wall As an Alternate Gravity Wall (Case Study Sindu Kusuma Edupark Project, Yogyakarta).
Martini, Shyama Maricar, Hendra Setiawan. (2012). Plaster Construction Planning Instead of Retaining Walls (Case Study Donggala Ring Road).
Septiana Widi Astuti. (2019). The stability of the Corrugated Concrete Sheet Pile (CCSP) of the Soil Retaining Wall at the Abutmen Bridge Bh 1751 in Lok Ulo District, Kebumen.
Smith, M.J. (1984). Soil Mechanics. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Wesley, Laurence D. (2012). Soil Mechanics For Sediment Soil And Residues. Andi. Yogyakarta.