Relationship Between Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Ambidexterity: Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation
Main Article Content
Abstract
The literature in management sciences highlights the importance of entrepreneurial orientation as a lever to enhance productivity, competitiveness, and strengthen the position of companies. Globally, businesses are increasingly investing in developing their innovation capabilities to meet the demands of the digital economy and the "Smart Life" era. In this context, the absorptive capacity for knowledge, as well as the ambidexterity of exploration and exploitation, play crucial roles. However, current research does not yet clearly specify the causal links between these concepts. This study aims to determine how absorptive capacity influences innovation ambidexterity, considering the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation.
Based on a positivist epistemological approach, this work relies on a literature review and the results of three exploratory studies. This leads to an explanatory model of the relationships between absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity, tested on 258 entrepreneurs and project holders in the ICT sector in Tunisia, operating within a "Smart City." The results show that absorptive capacity enhances innovation ambidexterity, with a significant mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation.
Key words: Absorptive capacity, ambidexterity, innovation exploration, innovation exploitation, entrepreneurial orientation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adler, Paul S., & Heckscher, Charles. (2011). Collaborative Community is the basis of organizational ambidexterity. Working draft: NOT for distribution.
Aggeri, F., & Labatut, J. (2010). Management through the prism of its instruments. A genealogical analysis of theoretical approaches based on management instruments. Finance Control Strategy, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 5-37.
Akremi, A., & Roussel, P. (2003). Analysis of moderating and mediating variables using structural equation methods: Applications in HRM. Proceedings of the 14th AGRH Congress, Grenoble.
Albert, P. (2000). The Creation of High Technology Enterprises, in T. Verstraete, History of Entrepreneurship – the Realities of Entrepreneurship, Management and Society Editions.
Alipour, Farhad, & Karimi, Roohangiz. (2011). Mediation Role of Innovation and Knowledge Transfer in the Relationship between Learning Organization and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 19, pp. 144-147.
Allard-Poesi, F., & Maréchal, C. (2007). Constructing the research object. In Thiétart, R. A. (Ed.), Research Methods in Management, 3rd edition, Dunod.
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. S1, pp. S9-S24.
Amidon, D. M. (2001). Innovation and Knowledge Management. Organization Editions, 232 p.
Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Pearson, 309 p.
Andriopoulos, C.-M., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696-717.
Angot, J., & Milano, P. (2007). How to link concepts and data? In Raymond-Alain Thiétart (Ed.), Research Methods in Management: 173-191. Paris: Dunod.
Arbussa, A., & Coenders, G. (2007). Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments, and absorptive capacity: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 36: 1545–1558.
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance. Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, March–April 2009, pp. 410–421.
Auguste Merle, St. Clair. (2011). An exploration of factors affecting absorptive capacity of knowledge in an organization in the Caribbean. School of Management Royal Holloway, University of London, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58: 1652-1661.
Barlatier, P.-J., Giannopoulou, E., & Penin, J. (2016). The intermediaries of open innovation between information management and knowledge management: the case of public research valorization. Innovations, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 55-77.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Druid working papers, No. 02-12.
Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 287-298.
Birkinshaw, J., Raisch, S., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4): 685-695.
Blindenbach-Driessen, F., & Ende, J. (2014). The Locus of Innovation: The Effect of a Separate Innovation Unit on Exploration, Exploitation, and Ambidexterity in Manufacturing and Service Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1089-1105.
Bohas, A., Faure, S., & de Vaujany, F. X. (2017). Third places, collaborative spaces: laboratories and revealers of new work practices. Research Note No. 2, Research Group on Collaborative Spaces.
Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., & Scapolan, A. (2014). The individual side of ambidexterity: Do individuals’ perceptions match actual behaviors in reconciling the exploration and exploitation trade-off? European Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 392-405.
Brion, S., Favre-Bonté, V., & Mothe, C. (2008). What forms of ambidexterity to combine exploitation and exploration innovations? Management International, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 29-44.
Brion, S., Mothe, C., & Sabatier, M. (2010). The Impact of Organizational Context and Competences on Innovation Ambidexterity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2): 151-178.
Brion, S., Mothe, C., & Sabatier, M. (2008). Ambidexterity at the level of innovation: The predominant impact of management modes on structural separation. French Management Review, 7(187): 177-194.
Bureau, S. (2013). Entrepreneurship as a subversive activity: how to destroy in the process of creative destruction? M@n@gement, 16(3), 204-237.
Burton, M.-D., O’Reilly, C.-A., & Bidwell, M. (2012). Management systems for exploration and exploitation: the micro-foundations of organizational ambidexterity. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston, August.
Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63, pp. 707–715.
Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009). Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organization Science, 20(2) : 294-312.
Caroline, Julie Ney, Véronique Favre Bonte, Christophe Baret. (2008). Towards a Model for Managing Ambidexterity: Internal Exploitation Innovation and Exploration Cooperation. Organizational Innovation: Current State, State of the Art, January 28, 2008, ESC ST-ETIENNE.
Chanal, V., & Mothe, C. (2005). How to reconcile exploitation innovation and exploration innovation: a case study in the automotive sector. French Management Review, 31(154): 173-191.
Chanal, V., & Mothe, C. (2004). What organizational design to combine exploration and exploitation innovation? 13th AIMS conference.
Chandrasekaran, A., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. (2012). Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1): 134-151.
Cohen, E., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Technology, organizations, and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-152.
Cohen, D., & Patrick. (2014). Knowledge communities, BourbaKeM Project Element No. 6.
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1095-1121.
Data, Avimanyu. (2010). Review and Extension on Ambidexterity: A Theoretical Model Integrating Networks and Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management and Strategy, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Data, Avimanyu. (2009). IT Based Knowledge Capability and Commercialization of Innovations: Modeling the impacts on ambidexterity and absorptive capacity. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(61). Link.
David, B. (2008). Innovation in the firm: Literature review and proposal of a model. Working Paper 2008-45.
Day, G. S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), pp. 37-52.
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors that influence the collaboration? Research Policy, 36(9): 1355-1366.
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2): 370-382.
Duchek, S. (2014). The evolution of ambidextrous organizations: New perspectives on exploration, exploitation, and performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4): 1-28.
Dunk, A. S. (2000). Understanding the role of management controls in enhancing performance. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies, 10(3): 219-231.
Egbetokun, A. A., & Adebiyi, A. A. (2010). A model for the interrelationship between absorptive capacity, innovation performance, and knowledge management. African Journal of Business Management, 4(3): 433-439.
Eiras, M. R., & Matos, J. B. (2010). Technological Innovation, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance. Journal of Business Research, 63(2): 129–136.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
El-Masry, A. A., & Al-Mahrouqi, F. (2014). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovation performance: the mediating role of organizational culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3): 556-575.
Enberg, K., & Taalas, S. (2006). The interplay between organizational design and strategic innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3): 263-276.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion, and transformation: an evolutionary view. Research Policy, 31(8): 1135-1155.
Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic Management in Public Services Organizations. Routledge.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 803-813.
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2015). Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come? Journal of Management, 41(1): 200-227.
Galunic, C., & Eisenhardt, K. (2001). Complexity and organizational learning: What do we know? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(3): 239-257.
Garbuio, M., & Lin, N. (2005). Rethinking the role of organizational learning in innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(2): 145-155.
Gassmann, O., & Zeschky, M. (2008). Opening up the innovation process: From closed to open innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(1): 1-10.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., & Scott, P. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications.
Gibbert, M., & Krause, D. (2002). Specialization and trade-offs: how firms can leverage their absorptive capacity. European Management Journal, 20(5): 510-517.
Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and implications for future research. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1): 23-30.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue): 109-122.
Gupta, A., & Singhal, A. (1993). Managing operational flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 12(3): 413-429.
Gupta, K., & Singhal, A. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: A review of the literature. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(7): 55-61.
Haeckel, S. H., & Carbone, L. P. (2000). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Harvard Business Review Press.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-749.
He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical study of the ambidextrous behavior of small and medium-sized enterprises. Research Policy, 33(1): 2-17.
Hennart, J.-F., & Slangen, A. (2015). Institutional and organizational factors influencing the multinationality of firms. International Business Review, 24(5): 726-733.
Hodge, M. (2010). Competitive Advantage, Firm Performance, and the Role of Internal Market Orientation: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(11): 50-59.
Hong, J., & Jeong, H. (2005). A strategic approach to exploring organizational ambidexterity: The impact of organizational culture on ambidextrous behavior. Management Decision, 43(7): 996-1012.
Huang, K. F. (2012). The relationship between organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance: A study of the textile industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(1): 149-162.
Huang, K., & D. H. H. (2006). Dynamic capabilities, organizational learning, and innovation: The case of new product development in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(1-4): 209-222.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploration and exploitation: The roles of the middle manager. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 775-802.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194.
Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of technological learning in industrial organizations. Organization Science, 8(3): 282-301.
Knott, A. M. (2008). The role of top management in the generation of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7): 771-788.
Ko, J., & K. Kim. (2010). Exploratory learning and organizational ambidexterity: A comparative study of high-tech SMEs in South Korea. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 3(1): 51-70.
Kwan, S. K., & Chan, A. (2006). A study of the relationships between knowledge management, organizational culture, and organizational performance. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2): 50-62.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 117-134.
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Lee, H. (2010). Does a firm’s absorptive capacity have a positive effect on its innovation performance? Journal of Business Research, 63(3): 289-297.
Li, L., & Zhao, Y. (2008). A multi-level perspective on the relationships between organizational culture and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(5): 1-25.
Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. (2006). Determinants of successful knowledge management systems: An empirical study. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3): 6-13.
Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, and entrepreneurial strategies: A study of UK university spin-offs. International Small Business Journal, 23(5): 407-429.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
Martin, C. (2008). On the role of intermediaries in the exploration-exploitation debate. Journal of Business Research, 61(4): 343-348.
Matusik, S. F., & Hill, C. W. L. (1998). The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 680-697.
McCarthy, A. (2009). Strategic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and innovation performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 26(3): 593-606.
McCarthy, A., & An, S. (2014). Linking absorptive capacity to performance: An investigation of innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16): 4673-4693.
Miller, D. J. (2006). The evolution of firm capabilities: When innovation meets organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2): 315-339.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Prentice-Hall.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 698-723.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 74-81.
O'Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. P. (2013). A systemic approach to creating radical innovation. California Management Review, 55(1): 116-139.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Innovation streams and ambidexterity: The role of senior management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(2): 176-192.
Parboteeah, K. P., & Valakivi, K. (2011). Organizational learning and innovation in emerging markets. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 1-6.
Perks, K. J., & Tzokas, N. (2005). The role of relationship management in successful innovation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(1): 54-65.
Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. Harper & Row.
Ookulangara, S., & Shephard, A. (2013). The role of organizational culture in innovation performance: An empirical investigation of small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4): 1-22.
Popper, K. R. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2): 233-244.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 211-233.
Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, H. (2010). The effects of innovation capability and firm performance: Evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4): 623-644.
Rindova, V., & Fombrun, C. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-specific resources and capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 170-184.
Rindova, V., & K. F. K. (2008). The dynamics of competitive advantage in markets. Journal of Business Research, 61(5): 484-489.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning exploration, organization learning and innovation. Organization Science, 12(3): 306-325.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-221.
Salter, A., & Gann, D. (2003). Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy, 32(1): 1-21.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4): 305-318.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 46-55.
Smirnova, M., & Koval, D. (2013). The influence of organizational culture on innovation performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(1): 90-101.
Sorenson, O. (2000). Letting the wind out of the sails: The impact of environmental dynamism on the performance of service firms. Organization Science, 11(5): 592-609.
Stankiewicz, R. (2005). Technology Transfer and Innovation: The Role of Universities. In Innovation, Technology and Knowledge Management (pp. 98-115). Palgrave Macmillan.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319-1350.
Terziovski, M. (2007). The role of innovation in the performance of small to medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(1): 98-114.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8-30.
Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge: The role of organization structure. Organization Studies, 20(5): 887-916.
Van der Sijde, P., & W. H. R. (2008). Building innovative capabilities in public organizations. Public Management Review, 10(3): 379-397.
Wang, C. L., & Wang, Y. (2012). The impact of knowledge management on innovation performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6): 835-853.
Wiggins, L. L., & Ruefli, T. W. (2005). Competitive advantage: The new competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 367-372.
Wu, L. Y. (2010). Innovation in the service industry: The impact of innovation strategy and organizational culture. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(1): 54-67.
Wu, W. P., & Chen, L. (2014). Organizational culture, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A study of small- and medium-sized enterprises in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(1): 66-86.
Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the evolution of the multinational corporation. Organization Science, 6(3) : 376-387.
Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2010). Innovation capability and performance of manufacturing firms: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 63(3) : 195-201.