How Work Environment and Rewards Affects the Employee Engagement
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of the work environment and reward on employee engagement at PT Futaba Industrial Indonesia.
Design/methodology/approach: This study uses quantitative descriptive research methods. The results showed that the work environment influences employee engagement, wherein the T-statistics for the variable work environment (X1) on employee engagement variables (Y) amounted to 3,847 more than T-table 1,675. The original sample estimate value shows a positive value of 0.279, which indicates that the direction of the work environment variable (X1) to the employee engagement variable (Y) is a significant positive effect. Thus Ha was accepted into the study.
Findings: The original sample estimate value shows a positive, indicating that the direction of the work environment variable (X1) to the employee engagement variable (Y) is a significant positive effect. The original sample estimate value shows that the relationship of the reward variable (X2) to the employee engagement variable (Y) is significantly positive.
Research limitations/implications: This research is only used as a sample, and the population is only in the welding section because it is not allowed to conduct research, so the results of this study are not comprehensive for all units in the company. Future research is expected to research all units in the company so that the research results.
Paper type: Research paper
Downloads
References
Arikunto. (2002). Prosedur Suatu Penelitian: Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi Kelima. Rineka Cipta.
Ghozali. (2015). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 20. Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. (Universitas Diponegoro (ed.)).
Ines, D. (2016). “Analisa Pengaruh Komunikasi Internal, Intrinsic Rewards Dan Recognition Terhadap Employee Engagement Di Surabaya Suite Hotel.” Ournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.00
Ivancevich. (2006). Perilaku Manajemen dan Organisasi (Gina Gania). Erlangga.
Lardner, S. (2015). ‘Effective reward ensures effective engagement’’.’ Strategic HR Review, 14(4), 31–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/hr-06-2015-0050
Meyer. (2013). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to Organization. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Nusatria, S. (2011). ‘Employee Engagement : Anteseden dan Konsekuensi.’ 1(1), 1–31.
Rahmanto, W. (2018). ’ Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dengan Keterikatan Kerja Pada PT.MCD ’.
Saks. (2006). “Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement.” Journal of Managerial Psychology. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Sarwono, dan N. (2015). Membuat Skripsi, Tesis dan Desertasi dengan Partial Least Square SEM (PLS-SEM). Andi.
Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2003a). Utrecht Employee engagement scale,’ Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University. 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01350-000.
Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2003b). ‘Utrecht Employee engagement scale’’.’ Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01350-000
Sedarmayanti. (2009). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Mandar Maju.
Sedarmayanti. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Refika Aditama.
Sharon. (2016). Analisis Dampak Dari gaji dan Penghargaan terhadap Keterlibatan karyawan Di Pt. Banksulutgo, Manado.’. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 16(01), 289–301.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. CV Alfabet.
Sutrisno. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Manusia. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJEBD International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development eISSN 2597-4785 pISSN 2597-4750
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
