The Government Responsibilities in Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic and Improving The Declining Economy in Indonesia
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to discuss health legal policy and the government responsibiliies in handling pandemic covid 19.
Design/methodology/approach: The writing of this article is done in a normative juridical manner. The approach used is a conceptual and statutory approach. In analyzing the problem, it is done by interpreting the laws and regulations and relevant facts. Legal theories are used to analyze existing problems in handling COVID-19 and handling economic recovery. This writing is done by combining legal disciplines concerning administrative law, health law and economic law.
Findings: Steps and legal policy have been taken to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic and improve the declining economy. This step requires a very large budget that is charged to the revenue and expenditure budget (APBN/APBD) and other posts that support the financing as regulated in Law No. 2 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling the Covid -19 Pandemic, and Presidential Regulation No. 99 of 2020 which has been amended by Presidential Decree No. 14 Year 2021.
Research limitations/implications: Legally, the use of the budget for handling Covid-19 and maintaining economic stability, as well as policies carried out at the discretion that has been determined, must be accounted for by the authorities. In the study of Administrative Law, the responsible steps of the authorities are always accompanied by supervision and sanctions in the event of a violation.
Originality/value: This paper is original
Paper type: a Research Paper
Downloads
References
Al-Fatih, S., & Aulia, F. I. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Kasus COVID-19 sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan HAM. Jurnal HAM, 12(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.30641/HAM.2021.12.349-366
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Hukum Tata Negara Darurat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Black, H. C. (1990). Black’s law dictionary : definitions of the terms and phrases of American and English jurisprudence, ancient and modern with guide to pronunciation (6th ed.). West Publishing.
Brouwer, J. G., & Schilder, A. E. (1998). A survey of Dutch administrative law.
Brown, L. N., Bell, J., & Galabert, J.-M. (1998). French administrative law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burgess, P. (2020). The Rule of Lore in the Rule of Law: Putting the Problem of the Rule of Law in Context. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12, 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40803-019-00096-0
Craig, P. P. (2003). Administrative Law. Sweet & Maxwell.
Hadjon, P., Lotulung, P. E., & Laica, H. M. (2010). Hukum administrasi dan good governance. Usakti.
Jacobini, H. B. (1991). An introduction to comparative administrative law. Oceana Publications.
Jain, M. P. (1997). Administrative Law of Malaysia and Singapore. Malaya Law Review, 32(1), 193–196.
Kant, I., & Hastie, W. (1887). The philosophy of law; an exposition of the fundamental principles of jurisprudence as the science of right. T. & T. Clark.
Locke, J., & Shapiro, I. (2003). Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Yale University Press.
Schepple, K. L. (2004). Law In A Time Of Emergency: States Of Exception And The Temptations Of 9/11. Journal of Constitution Law, 6(5), 1001:1083. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1365&context=jcl
Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (G. Schwab (ed.)). The University of Chikago Press.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJEBD International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development eISSN 2597-4785 pISSN 2597-4750
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
