Linking Productivity and Competitive Advantage: The Mediation of Quality Results
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: Most studies have shown that there is a significant relationship between productivity and competitive advantage, but none have attempted to include a contingency variable to provide more insight into the nature of this relationship. To fill this gap, this study was conducted to empirically verify this relationship by including 'quality results' as a contingency variable.
Design/methodology/Approach: Quantitative research approach was employed and primary data was collected from TAZARA management employees. Model fit, reliability and validity were tested using regression analysis, factor analysis and principal component analysis using Jamovi software.
Findings: The results show that there is a positive and significant relationship between productivity and competitive advantage, and between quality results and competitive advantage. The results also show that quality results partially mediate the relationship between productivity and competitive advantage.
Practical implications: The study provides insights on the nature of the relationship between productivity and competitive advantage. The study proves that quality results is critical to improving and sustaining productivity to promote competitiveness in an organisation. As organisations relentlessly seek to maintain and gain competitiveness through productivity, managers and employees need to understand how quality results can be integrated into all operations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Buckley, P. J., Pass, C. L., & Prescott, K. (1988). Measures of international competitiveness: a critical survey. Journal of marketing management, 4(2), 175-200.
Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2014). Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 199-218.
Chaniago, Y. M. Z., & Mudjiardjo, L. A.(2021). The Effect of Service Difference and Logistic Service Quality on Competitive Advantage and Impact on Marketing Performance. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 6(8).
Dresch, A., Collatto, D. C., & Lacerda, D. P. (2018). Theoretical understanding between competitiveness and productivity: firm level. Ingeniería y competitividad, 20(2), 69-86.
Fan, K., O’Sullivan, C., Brabazon, A., and O’Neill, M. (2008). Non-linear principal component analysis of the implied volatility smile using a quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm. In Natural computing in computational finance (pp. 89-107). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Canonical correlation: A supplement to multivariate data analysis. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall Publishing: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Structural equation modeling: An introduction. Multivariate data analysis. 6th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 752-753.
Juran JM (1993) Made in U.S.A.: a renaissance in quality. Harvard business review, 71 4, 42-7, 50.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Kusumadewi, R. N., & Karyono, O. (2019). Impact of Service Quality and Service Innovations on Competitive Advantage in Retailing. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 2(2), 366-74.
Landau, S., & Everitt, B. S. (2003). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Lee, W. R., Beruvides, M. G., & Chiu, Y. D. (2007). A study on the quality–productivity relationship and its verification in manufacturing industries. The Engineering Economist, 52(2), 117-139.
Nanda, P. K., Sahai, A. K., & Das, S. K. (2022). Understanding the co-relationships of variables and improving product quality and productivity of DRI in rotary kiln. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 1538-1541.
Nunnally, J.D. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Prasad, K. D., Jha, S. K., & Prakash, A. (2015). Quality, productivity and business performance in home based brassware manufacturing units. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 270-287.
Raynor, M. E. (1992). Quality as a strategic weapon. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(5), 3-9.
Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2016, April). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014: Full data edition. World Economic Forum.
Yadav, R. N., Kumar, D., Sharma, A. K., & Virmani, N. (2022). Analysing human and system related barriers of TQM in automobile industries using fuzzy DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 35(2), 193-219.
Yangailo, T. (2022). Globalization on The Railway Transport Sector. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 15(3).
Yangailo, T. (2022). The Impact of Quality Results and Important Innovation as TQM Practices on Organisational Productivity: The case of Railway Sector. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences,4(3),327-336 DOI:10.24874/PES04.03.010
Yangailo, T. (2023). Assessing the influence of transformational leadership on competitive advantage through important innovations and quality results: Case of railway industry. Management Science Letters, 13(1), 41-50.
Yangailo, T., Kabela, J., & Turyatunga, H. (2023). The Impact of Total Quality Management Practices on Productivity in the Railway Sector in African Context. Proceedings on Engineering, 5(1), 177-188.