The Effect of Enviromental Score, Social Score and Governance Score Toward Financial Performance
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to analyze the influence of Enviromental Score, Social Score and Governance Score on the Financial Performance in non Financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2019-2021
Design/methodology/approach: The sampling method used is purposive sampling method. Data analysis using SPSS 24.0 test tool by descriptive statistics, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression test and hypothesis test
Findings: The results showed that Enviromental Score, Social Score and Governance Score not significant to financial performance which measured with stock performance there are PER (Price Earning Ratio) and DPR (Devidend Payout Ratio). These considerations are expected to have a good information about Enviromental Score, Social Score and Governance Score to investor that has no effect to stock performance for.
Research limitations/implications: The limitation of this study is that there are many companies that have not fully implemented the ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) report as a whole so that there is a lot of reduced data that has previously been selected as a research sample.
Practical implications: Can be used by company management policies in determining what strategy to use in increasing ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) scores and financial performance. And indirectly, an increase in ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) and financial performance scores can increase the attractiveness of potential investors and investors so that companies can grow more rapidly and survive with a better level of health.
Originality/value: Originality
Paper type: Research paper
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance panel study of malaysian companies. Management of environmental quality: an interntional journal, 29(2), 182-194. https://doi.org.10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
Batae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Felega, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: a european study. Journal of cleaner production, 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? evidence from the european banking sector. Management of environmental quality: an interntional journal, 30(1),98-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
Buallay, A., Fadel, M.F., Al-Ajmi, J,Y. & Saudagaran, S. (2020). Sustainability reporting and performance of MENA banks: is there a trade-off?,24(2), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2018-0078.
Brigham dan Houston. (2019). Fundamentals Of Financial Management. Nelson Education, Ltd
Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: moderating role of ESG investors. International review of financial analysis, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291
Gholami, A., Murray, P.A., & Sands, J. (2022). Environmental, social, governance & financial performance disclosure for large firms : is this different for SME firms?. Sustainability, 14, 6019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106019
Giannopoulus, G., Fagernes, R. V. K., Elmarzouky, M., & Hossain, K. A. B. M. A. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of nowergian listed firms. Journal of risk and financial management, 15, 327. https://doi.org.10.3390/jrfm15060237
Hatane, S.E., Winoto, J., Tarigan, J. & Jie, F. (2022). Working capital management and board diversity towards firm performances in Indonesia’s LQ45. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, , 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2018-0130
Istanti S.L.W & Juliarto, A. (2019). Corporate Governance Implications For Earnings Quality. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 669-676. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.E1094.0585C19
Kim, J., Son, S., & Jin, I. (2022). The effects of shareholding of the national pension fund on environmental, social, governance, and financial performance : evidence from the korean manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 14, 11788. htpps://doi.org/10.3390/su14181178
Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & Chu, X. (2022). ESG and financial performance: a qualitative comparative analysis in china's new energy companies. Journal of cleaner production, 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134721
Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). ESG dimensions and bank performance: and empirical investigation in italy. Corporate governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0094
Nainggolan, Y. A., Prahmila, D. I., & Syaputri, A. R. (2022). Do board characteristics affect bank risk tasking and performance? evidence from indonesian and malaysian islamic banks. Journal of management and governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09625-w
Solimun. (2017). Metode Statistika Multivariat Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM) Pendekatan WarpPLS. UB Press
Toth, B., Makra, E. L., Szladek, D., & Kiss, G. D. (2021). The contribution of ESG information to the financial stability of european banks. Public finance quarterly. https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_3_7
Yuen, M.K., Ngo, T., & Ho, T.H & Le Tu. D.Q (2020). The environment, social and governance (ESG) activities and profitability under COVID-19: evidence from the global banking sector. Journal of Economics and Development, 24(4), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-08-2022-0136
Wijayanti, R., Diyanty, V., & Laela, S. F. (2018). Education strategy misfit, board effectiveness and indonesian islamic bank performance. Journal of islamic accounting and business research, 11(4), 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2017-0052