Alignment of Knowledge Management and Performance Management System (Case Study: PT.X)

Article Sidebar

Pdf
Published Sep 30, 2019
DOI https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v3i1.911

Main Article Content

Atikah Aghdhi Pratiwi
Industrial Engineering Department ITS

Abstract



  1. Purpose: Improve company’s performance by capturing critical knowledges of employee in each Department.


    Design/methodology/approach: Knowledge audit is used to capture the knowledge database, and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to obtain critical knowledge.


    Findings: The results show that there are 30 points knowledges with 3 critical knowledges in the Department of Production.


    Research limitations/implications: The study focused only on E-Print product, especially for Department of Production.


    Practical implications: Knowledge is one of intangible assets in a company. Aligning knowledge with performance management system will support the company to achieve it’s goaals and the sustainability of the company.  


    Paper type: This paper can be categorized as case study paper.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 3 No 1 (2019): September 2019
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Brooking, A., 1997. The Management of intellectual capital. Long Range Plan, pp. 30 (3) : 364-365.
Chen, A. & Chen, M., (2005) : 1995 - 2004. A review of survey research in Knowledge Management performance measurement. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management, pp. 1: 4-12..
De Jarnett, L., 1996. Knowledge the Latest Thing. Information Strategy : Executive Journal, pp. 12(2): 3-5..
Kaplan, R. & Norton, D., 2000. Balanced Scorecard, Menerapkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Luis, S., 2007. Step by Step in Cascading Balanced Scorecard to Functional Scorecards. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Murray, P., 2002. Knowledge Management as a sustained competitive advantage. pp. 66(4): 71-76.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., 1995. How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics in Innovation. The Knowledge Creating Company :.
Paramasivan, T., 2003. Knowledge Audit, India: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Parmenter, D., 2007. Key Performance Indicators : Pengembangan, Implementasi, dan Penggunaan KPI Terpilih. 1 penyunt. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Roy et al, R., 2000. A Framework to Create Performance Indicators in Knowledge Management. Proc. of The Third Intl. Conf. on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM2000), pp. 1-8.
Roy, R. & et al, 2000. A Framework to Create Performance Indicators in Knowledge Management. Proc. of The Third Intl. Conf. on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM2000), pp. 1-8.
Saaty, T. L., 1990. The Analytical Network Process.
Sholihah, M., 2013. Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja ITS International Office Dengan Menggunakan Balanced Scorecard (Laporan Tugas Akhir), Surabaya: ITS, Jurusan Teknik Industri.
Sipayung , F., 2009. Balanced Scorecard : Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan dan Sistem Manajemen Strategis. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, pp. 7-14.
Suwignjo, P., 2009. Manajemen Performansi [Power Point Slides], Surabaya: Teknik Industri ITS.
Wong, K. & Aspinwall, E., 2006. Development of a Knowledge Management initiative and system: a case study.,.. Expert System Application, pp. 30(4): 633-641.
Wu, W.-W., 2008. Choosing Knowledge Management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 12(1), pp. 828-835.
Wu, W.-W., 2012. Segmenting critical factors for successful knolwedge Management implementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), pp. 527-535.
Yuliazmi, 2011. Penerapan Knowledge Management pada Perusahaan Reasuransi : Studi Kasus PT. Reasuransi Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta: Magister Ilmu Komputer - Universitas Budi Luhur.